Residents of Koppies Extension 5 have endured severe water shortage for more than three years, with many households experiencing intermittent or no access to running water.
The prolonged disruption has placed significant strain on the community, raising concerns about basic living conditions and the municipality’s ability to provide essential services.
The DA has indicated that it will submit formal follow-up questions to the Ngwathe Local Municipality and escalate the matter through council oversight structures, in an effort to ensure the implementation of sustainable, long-term water solutions.
Running water was partially restored to parts of Koppies Extension 5 on 24 April, following a call for urgent intervention made on 22 March. The restoration came more than a month after the initial appeal and only after sustained pressure had been applied.
ALSO READ: Free State water crisis highlights human rights failures
While the return of water has been welcomed by residents, concerns remain that the response was reactive rather than the result of proper planning or consistent service delivery.
Observers note that the situation highlights ongoing challenges within the municipality’s infrastructure management and maintenance systems.
Residents have pointed out that the recent restoration demonstrates that solutions are achievable, but question why such measures were not implemented sooner or maintained consistently in the predicament experienced due to water shortage for more than three years.
Access to water is widely regarded as a fundamental human right, and community members have expressed frustration that reliable supply appears to depend on crisis-driven responses.
Cllr Carina Serfontein of the DA in the Ngwathe Local Municipality says calls have been made for a sustained and dependable water supply, alongside the urgent implementation of long-term, permanent solutions.
“Additional demands include improved maintenance of infrastructure and equipment, as well as clear and consistent communication during outages, including contingency plans,” she stated.
The developments between March and April have underscored the extent to which intervention and public pressure were required to prompt action. Residents argue that essential services should be delivered consistently, without the need for repeated escalation.
